Revealing the Devastating Truth Behind Netflix's Death by Lightning
For generations, the family members of James Garfield discussed openly about his extraordinary achievements but seldom discussed his violent end. “We knew what had happened, that he was gunned down in a railway depot,” explains one of his living relatives. “We learned about the story in books but, for various reasons, we just passed over it quickly.”
Renewed Attention in a Overlooked Leader
This shifted in 2011 with the publication of a presidential biography, which revived interest in Garfield's truncated career. This work has now inspired a streaming series titled Death by Lightning, starring a talented performer as the national leader and Matthew Macfadyen as the wanderer who assassinated him.
The series seeks to illuminate Garfield, who rose from poverty to the White House during the historical period only to fall victim to its deep political rifts. His tenure was cut short after only 200 days not only by the killer's weapon but by physician mistakes – an tragedy now mostly overlooked while the deaths of the Civil War president and President Kennedy continue to intrigue the public.
“One cannot help but admire what he did. He was a true polymath: he was a legal professional, he was a religious leader, he was a land worker. He was so many things which also formed his character and how he was and the complete story about him the relatives maintain with us.”
Starting from Nothing to the Highest Office
Garfield was the final national leader raised in rustic conditions in Cuyahoga County in 1831. His parent passed away when he was very young, leaving his parent, Eliza, to support a large family in difficult circumstances. An voracious learner, Garfield labored on waterways to make funds for an education.
He learned legal principles, was entered the clergy, became leader of an institution in Ohio and was a political representative. In 1858 he wed a previous schoolmate, his partner, with whom he would have a large family. An passionate nationalist, Garfield viewed the national conflict as a moral battle against forced servitude and progressed to the officer status.
“As I studied his life, I couldn't believe it. He was remarkably smart. He was fearless. He was very progressive for the time. He was caring. He was a moral individual and would have been an outstanding leader had he remained alive.”
Political Career and Shocking Selection
Garfield was persuaded by Lincoln to leave army service when he was chosen to the Congress, where he would serve as a Republican for nearly two decades. He was ardent advocate of black suffrage, viewing it as a issue of rights and the fulfillment of a military promise.
“His oration on the legislative arena will affect you emotionally. He was an impressive communicator and this matter was very important to him.”
At the political assembly in Chicago the faction was fundamentally fractured between the “Stalwarts”, led by Senator Roscoe Conkling, who supported a continued leadership for former president, and the “rival group”, who supported political contender. Garfield attended as a advocate of his close associate John Sherman.
When the 15,000-person convention was stalled between Grant and Blaine, representatives began seeking a solution. Garfield's emotional address nominating Sherman impressed them. During the speech, he reportedly declared, “And now, representatives, what do we want?” to which a audience member unexpectedly replied, “We want Garfield!”
On the extended selection process, a rush of supporters made Garfield the shocking choice. To placate the Stalwart faction, Chester Arthur, a Conkling loyalist from New York, was chosen as his running mate. In the general election Garfield overcame the rival politician to become the sole representative of the House ever to be chosen as leader.
Short Presidency and Power Struggles
“His possible achievements and what is remarkably uncommon and maybe special for the American presidency is he wasn't seeking the position. It's not that he had never thought about it but he was pushed toward it.”
The central struggle of Garfield's short presidency was his disagreement with Conkling over the “spoils system”. Conkling demanded control over government appointments in New York, particularly the influential position of customs official. Garfield rejected, stating the issue was “whether the president is registering clerk of the senate or the nation's leader”. He nominated a rival of Conkling to the post.
The confrontation escalated into a visible struggle but Garfield outsmarted Conkling in the Senate. Facing a embarrassing loss, Conkling and his associate left their positions in protest. The next day, Garfield's selection was confirmed. It was a historic triumph for the presidential control over the political organization and for the improvement efforts over “machine politics”.
The Assassin and His Mental Illness
But even as Garfield fought powerful figures of his party, he was being stalked by a disturbed and delusional man who embodied the problematic element of the political appointment process. The gunman was a wanderer with a history of career disappointments, mental instability and early life difficulties. He had been unsuccessful as a attorney, bill collector, religious figure and member of a free-love commune.
“He was psychologically disturbed and his specific type of insanity was delusion. He always believed that God had chosen him for significance. He actually had financially a better start than Garfield but where Garfield progressed and improved, Guiteau was unsuccessful in all endeavors.”
But Guiteau believed he had finally found a pathway to success: politics. Carried away in the drama of the 1880 election, he wrote and delivered an insignificant speech, and became certain in his thoughts that he was single-handedly responsible for Garfield's victory.
Under this thinking, Guiteau determined he had deserved a important role. He journeyed to DC and continuously bothered Garfield, Blaine and other authorities, insisting to be made the foreign service officer — a position for which he had no experience. He became such a nuisance that he was eventually prohibited from the White House.
The Shooting and Medical Malpractice
On 2 July 1881, just four months into his presidency, Garfield was leaving Washington for his educational gathering. As he passed through the transportation center, Guiteau appeared suddenly, pulled an ivory-handled British Bull Dog revolver from his coat pocket and assassinated the leader in the back.
Garfield shouted: “What's happening?” and dropped on the waiting area. When a {police officer|law